Comments on: lxml 1.3.2 released, installers for Windows available http://blog.sidneidasilva.com/2007/07/11/lxml-132-released-installers-for-windows-available/ Mon, 14 Feb 2011 05:53:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: sidnei http://blog.sidneidasilva.com/2007/07/11/lxml-132-released-installers-for-windows-available/#comment-9795 Fri, 13 Jul 2007 12:56:56 +0000 http://awkly.org/2007/07/11/lxml-132-released-installers-for-windows-available/#comment-9795 Well… I actually *do* mind. I believe that people will be confused by too many options, and that there’s a lot more people still using the installer than using eggs.

Now, turning this around a bit, why don’t we propose a change to setuptools so it is able to use the installer? It is just a zip file with an executable header (you can test that by doing ‘unzip lxml-…..exe’).

]]> By: Philipp von Weitershausen http://blog.sidneidasilva.com/2007/07/11/lxml-132-released-installers-for-windows-available/#comment-9783 Fri, 13 Jul 2007 10:26:44 +0000 http://awkly.org/2007/07/11/lxml-132-released-installers-for-windows-available/#comment-9783 Hey, thanks for doing this! Would you also mind creating Windows eggs? They’re very useful for buildout-based applications.

]]> By: Luciano Pacheco http://blog.sidneidasilva.com/2007/07/11/lxml-132-released-installers-for-windows-available/#comment-9716 Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:22:12 +0000 http://awkly.org/2007/07/11/lxml-132-released-installers-for-windows-available/#comment-9716 Bem melhor esse look’n'feel !

Cheguei aqui pelo pythonbrasil/planet e nem sabia que estava no seu blog!

Até mais.

]]>