<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Crossing the web app chasm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sidneidasilva.com/2007/09/06/crossing-the-web-app-chasm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sidneidasilva.com/2007/09/06/crossing-the-web-app-chasm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 20:09:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: wichert</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidneidasilva.com/2007/09/06/crossing-the-web-app-chasm/#comment-12189</link>
		<dc:creator>wichert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 12:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awkly.org/2007/09/06/crossing-the-web-app-chasm/#comment-12189</guid>
		<description>My grok app starts in 1.7 seconds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My grok app starts in 1.7 seconds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Teague</title>
		<link>http://blog.sidneidasilva.com/2007/09/06/crossing-the-web-app-chasm/#comment-12181</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Teague</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2007 07:26:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://awkly.org/2007/09/06/crossing-the-web-app-chasm/#comment-12181</guid>
		<description>INFO root Startup time: 1.976 sec real, 1.960 sec CPU

Grok starts up in just a hair less than 2 seconds on my hardware - it&#039;s a MacBook Pro with 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo, so perhaps a bit spiffier than average hardware. It is a lot more pleasant than the 15 or so seconds my Plone restarts take.

Stating all of your URL patterns in a central place a-la Routes has it&#039;s appeal. It wouldn&#039;t be too hard to write a custom Traverser for a Grok Application that resolved the rest of the URL in a Routes-like fashion. You would need to constrain your object heirarchy to just container/model, or require that all objects are indexed like Plone&#039;s portal_catalog, or use SQLAlchemy.  Pylons Controllers could map to Grok Containers, and Pylons Actions could map to Grok Views. It&#039;s not exactly a clean fit though, so you&#039;d probably want to change the semantics of your Routes-like API a fair bit. Or perhaps with a heavy dose of metaprogramming you could have map.connect() calls create Grok Traverser classes, although that would probably be way too funky ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>INFO root Startup time: 1.976 sec real, 1.960 sec CPU</p>
<p>Grok starts up in just a hair less than 2 seconds on my hardware &#8211; it&#8217;s a MacBook Pro with 2.1 GHz Core 2 Duo, so perhaps a bit spiffier than average hardware. It is a lot more pleasant than the 15 or so seconds my Plone restarts take.</p>
<p>Stating all of your URL patterns in a central place a-la Routes has it&#8217;s appeal. It wouldn&#8217;t be too hard to write a custom Traverser for a Grok Application that resolved the rest of the URL in a Routes-like fashion. You would need to constrain your object heirarchy to just container/model, or require that all objects are indexed like Plone&#8217;s portal_catalog, or use SQLAlchemy.  Pylons Controllers could map to Grok Containers, and Pylons Actions could map to Grok Views. It&#8217;s not exactly a clean fit though, so you&#8217;d probably want to change the semantics of your Routes-like API a fair bit. Or perhaps with a heavy dose of metaprogramming you could have map.connect() calls create Grok Traverser classes, although that would probably be way too funky &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
